“Arab of the Arabs” – Black Roots of Semitic Arabia by D. W. Reynolds
Modern Saudi Arabian |
“…the predominant complexion of the Arabs is dark
brownish black and that of the non-Arabs
is white.” Ibn Mandour (14th Century) Lisaan al-Arab IV:209.
“The
south Arabs represent a residue of
hamitic populations which at one time occupied the whole of Arabia.
“ John D. Baldwin from Pre-historic
nations or inquiries Concerning Some of the Great peoples and Civilizations of
Antiquity. Harpers 1869
“The Zanj say that God did
not make them black in order to disfigure them; rather it is their environment
that made them so. The best evidence of this is that there are black tribes
among the Arabs, such as the Banu Sulaim bin Mansur, and that all the peoples settled in the Harra,
besides the Banu Sulaim are black.” Abu Uthman Al-Jahiz of Iraq 9th century A.D.
One might be surprised, but it is noteworthy
that in our time black American soldiers in Northern Iraq
have found themselves surrounded by children exclaiming excitedly “the original
Muslim, the original Muslim!” Professional basketball players from teams in America including the NBA upon visiting Turkey
have also found themselves called “Arab” or "Arapy". In fact in much of the area
directly North of the so-called Arab world the word "Arab" is the equivalent of black
African.
As David Goldenberg writes, “This view of the Arab as dark-skinned is also found among other peoples, as is indicated by the term arap (i.e., Arab) meaning 'black African' in modern Turkish, Greek, and Russian, as well as in Yiddish” (Goldenberg, 2005, p. 124). And, this is the case because their peoples still have folk history of the original Arab invaders of their lands. The descriptions and depictions of the earliest Arabs or kara-Arapy (“black Arabs”) are not infrequent in their histories and folktales.
As David Goldenberg writes, “This view of the Arab as dark-skinned is also found among other peoples, as is indicated by the term arap (i.e., Arab) meaning 'black African' in modern Turkish, Greek, and Russian, as well as in Yiddish” (Goldenberg, 2005, p. 124). And, this is the case because their peoples still have folk history of the original Arab invaders of their lands. The descriptions and depictions of the earliest Arabs or kara-Arapy (“black Arabs”) are not infrequent in their histories and folktales.
There is, for
example, the texts of the Kurdish writer Ibn Athir (12th – 13th
century) which speak of the Sulaym/Sulaim folk hero "Sa’d al-Aswad" as being literally
black because he came from the “purest” Arabs. A Persian Jewish Targum to Song
1: 5 uses the phrase “black as the Kushites who live in the tents of
Kedar.” to describe peoples of north Arabia. (Goldenberg, p. 244) There are
also numerous early indigenous paintings as found below.
Arab tribes had
been settled since not long after the birth of Christianity in the region of Turkey (Anatolia) and northern Mesopotamia
so the peoples of those regions had become quite familiar with what such people
looked like. Unfortunately modern Arab nationalism as created the impression that such peoples located in the region are "Arab" is seen by modern conversation today. The discussion on the blogpost below is the perfect example of what happens when one begins to confuse nationality with biological origins. : ) http://www.civilarab.com/are-chaldeans-arabs-too-i-hope-so/
The early accounts
with descriptions of the earliest Arabians, along with physical anthropological
evidence show that until approximately 600 years ago peoples of mainly African-Asiatic
affiliation dominated most of peninsular Arabia.
Though today a good number of people of the Arabian peninsula resemble the majority of the people of the Levant (Syria, Lebanon, Palestine). In fact certain writers of Syrian and Andalusian origin such as Al-Umari and
Ibn Khaldun of the 14th century considered Arabia part of the “Bilad es-Sudan”
- or lands of “the Sudan” or black peoples. Ibn Khaldun in particular includes
the regions of Arabia (Hijaz, and Central Arabia or Nejd)
in his chapter on “the 2nd
zone of Sudan”.
Ibn
Khaldun in his own words asserts the following about the zones of Bilad as-Sudan
or “the lands of the blacks”. He writes first,
“The first and second zones are excessively hot and black…The inhabitants of
the first and second zones in the south are called the Abyssinians, the Zanj,
and the Sudanese. These are synonyms used to designate the particular nation
that has turned black” (Rosenthal, 1954, p. 171).
Another modern scholar Uthmān
Sayyid Ahmad Ismā’īl Bīlī summarized in more detail what Ibn Khaldun relates of the peoples and geography of
the two zones of the blacks or Bilad es-Sudan.
West
Africa, according to these sub-zonal divisions, falls in the first section of
the first zone. This section also includes the lands of the Veiled Berber. Nuba
is in the middle of this first zone, in the fourth section of it and Abyssinia
is in the fifth section, the same section in which the Indian
ocean ends. Yemen
is in the sixth section of the first zone. Ghana
and Zaghawa as well as Qanuriyah (the lands of the Kanuri or Bornu) fall in the first and second sections of
the second Zone and Hijaz and Nejd are in the
sixth section of that zone. The Buja lands lie in the third and fourth sections
of the second zone. Upper
Egypt lies in the fourth section of the second zone and lower
Egypt lies in the fifth section of it (Bili, 2008, pp. 17-18).
Thus Khaldun names the regions comprising the “hot
and black” zones the Nejd or Central Arabia, Hijaz or Western Arabia and the Yemen
which refer to each of the portions of Arabia, except for the East where Persians had already settled in large numbers. After the 1st zone which
includes the Yemen and Abyssinians and the 2nd zone comprising the Ghana, Hijaz, Nejd, the Beja (Buja). He asserts that most of Egypt falls also into the bilad-es-Sudan. Interestingly he leaves out Western "India" which included modern day Pakistan and Punjab which was apparently in his day was already much closer to the peoples of Syria and the Mediterranean in appearance.
Islamic scholar Wesley Muhammed writes of Ibn Khaldun’s schemata:
Islamic scholar Wesley Muhammed writes of Ibn Khaldun’s schemata:
Ibn Khaldun (d. 1405) in his Muqqadima, has an
important discussion of the seven zones and their inhabitants. According to Ibn Khaldun’s formulation, there
are three ‘middle’ or moderate zones: 3, 4, and 5. The inhabitants are distinguished by temperate
bodies, complexions, character qualities and general conditions. Included in
these temperate zones are the Maghrib, Syria,
the two Iraqs, Western
India, China, and Spain. Iraq and
Syria are in the very center, we are told, and are thus the most
temperate. Zones 6 and 7 includes the
European Christian nations, Eastern
Europe, Russia
and the lands of the Turks. These are the white lands and Zone 7 is excessively
cold, producing excessively white peoples with blue eyes, freckled skin, and
blond hair. (Muhamad, 2012, )
In Medieval texts Bilad es-Sudan according to Bernard Lewis often included areas
extending from Western Africa to parts of India Ocean and Southeast Asia the
latter being the lands of the black countries of “Sin” - a usual reference
in early Arab texts to Java and Masin (with the latter being Indo-China, then land of the Kunlun/Kwanlun peoples) of early Arab writers such as
al-Jahiz and Ya’qubi (circa 9th c.)(Lewis, B.). Today, in fact, many
peoples of the Dhana or Dahna desert extending north of the Central Arabian
region to the borders of the Tihama are
still largely of a dark brown color probably similar to their ancestors
belonging to the tribes of Qays Ailan, otherwise known as Muzar/Mudar (also
written Muzir or Mudar).
Some men from the region of Tihamah
Some men from the region of Tihamah
The tribal confederation of Muzar (Mizra of
the Bible - mistranslated in the West as the country called “Egypt”) were the
descendants of peoples dwelling in black goat skin tents include the numerous northern
Arabian tribes, descendents of “Al Nas” (also known as Qays or Qays’ Ailan) as
well as of his traditional brother “Al Yas” or Elias. Among them were clans of Quraysh, Kinana, Hudhail, Asad, Tamim, Dabba,
Ribab (Rabab), Rabi’a, Bahila, Sulaym, Bakr bin Wa’il, Numayr, Anmar and Hilal
of the Hawazin. From the latter were also derived Banu or Beni
‘Amir bin Sa’a Sa’a and their sub tribes of Ka’b or Chub, al-Muntafik’ and Uqayl/Aqil.
These Banu
Amir were perhaps the largest of the north Arabian bedouin or Mudar confederations,
consisting of dozens of sub-tribes. A colonial writer noted that, “Ibn Khaldun
states on the authority of Ibn Hazm that the great sept of the banu ‘Amir ibn
Sa’sa’ah alone equaled in numbers all the other Modarite tribes.” Their descendants still occupy the Central
Arabian deserts and southern Iraq.
In Iraq
they in fact today face much discrimination due to their still “khudar” or near
black “Arab” complexion.
The Arab Press
Service first released the following statement in 2008.
"There
are two main categories of blacks in Iraq, mostly in the south, who total about
300,000: those of East African origin, numbering around 100,000; and those of
who are Arab and originate from the Hejaz, claiming to be descended from the
Prophet Muhammad, who moved to this country mostly in the 1750s and 1980s. The
latter are mostly from the Muntafek tribe to which 'Abdul-Mahdi belongs. But
both groups used to be far more numerous in the past centuries, many of them
having inter-married with the locals and thus the colour of their skin has
since been changed…” APS Diplomat Redrawing the Islamic Map
By the 10th century these sub-tribes
of Banu Amir or Hawazin/Hawazeen bin Mansour named Uqayl, Ka’b (from which come the
Muntafik) and Kilab, had left the southern Nejd or deserts of south Central
Arabia to move into Iraq and
Syria
by the early Abbasid period. The Rabi’a
and Hilal of the Hawazin with their sister tribe of Sulaym bin Mansour had also
moved into northern Africa by the 11th century
where they were the dominant Arab peoples there. Many had in fact crossed over
into Spain
where a Persian author, Ibn Rabihu, wrote in the same century penned a book
called, The Precious Necklace (or
Al-Iqd al Farid). In this text the author notes how a 7th century administrator
of the Qahtan tribe asserted that an Arab with fair skin would be “unthinkable”
and was “rarer than one of the 7 wonders of the world”.
It was these populations of original or indigenous Arabs of peninsular Arabia that the 14th century Arab linguist and grammarian Ibn Mandhour (or Manzur -of Tunisa and Egypt) spoke of in his text, Arab Lessons (or Lisaan al-Arab) noting that Arabs were distinguished by their brown-black skins and kinky hair, while fair skin and lank hair was characteristic of the Persians (Lisaan al-Arab ).
In 1862, G. Rawlinson described the appearance of the Banu Ka'b or Cha'ab bin Rebi'ah and Muntafik bin Uqayl bin Ka'b (Cha'ab or Chub) of the Beni Amier claiming they had a complexion comparable to that of the "Galla" (Oromo) of Ethiopia (Rawlinson, 2002, p. 35), but were also "tall" and muscular". Another volume of his Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World reads, "The Cha'ab Arabs, the present possessors of the more southern part of Babylonia are nearly black..." (2002, p. 165).
It was these populations of original or indigenous Arabs of peninsular Arabia that the 14th century Arab linguist and grammarian Ibn Mandhour (or Manzur -of Tunisa and Egypt) spoke of in his text, Arab Lessons (or Lisaan al-Arab) noting that Arabs were distinguished by their brown-black skins and kinky hair, while fair skin and lank hair was characteristic of the Persians (Lisaan al-Arab ).
In 1862, G. Rawlinson described the appearance of the Banu Ka'b or Cha'ab bin Rebi'ah and Muntafik bin Uqayl bin Ka'b (Cha'ab or Chub) of the Beni Amier claiming they had a complexion comparable to that of the "Galla" (Oromo) of Ethiopia (Rawlinson, 2002, p. 35), but were also "tall" and muscular". Another volume of his Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World reads, "The Cha'ab Arabs, the present possessors of the more southern part of Babylonia are nearly black..." (2002, p. 165).
Elsewhere he writes,
“The
Cha’ab Arabs, the present possessors of the more southern parts of Babylonia are nearly black and the ‘black Syrians’ of
whom Strabo speaks seem to represent the Babylonians.” In fact Rawlinson was nearly correct in his assessment which equated such people with the Babylonians as the closely
related clan of Banu Numayr ibn Qassit according to Arab
tradition had in remote times conquered and settled in Babylonia in ancient
times under their leader Numayr or Numeiri (meaning panther), and he is none
other than the “Nimrod son of Kush” of the Hebrew book of Genesis.
Bedouin from Dhana (or "Dahna") desert, north central Arabia |
Edward Balfour in
the 1880s described the Ka’b as a powerful Arab clan near the banks of the Euphrates
from Korna to Samvat in the province
of Baghdad (Balfour,
1885, p. 163). In the 1994 Islamic
Desk Reference, we are told al-Muntafiq are a clan of the Amir bin Sa’sa’a
that dominated the country between Baghdad to Basra between the 17th and
19th centuries however, their “might declined through increasingly centralising
Ottoman policy” (Van Donzel, 1994, p. 293).
The Misread of Medieval Descriptions
“…all the peoples settled in the Harra besides the Banu Sulaim are black like the tribe of the Banu Sulaym who live in the lava lands of north Arabia and are rendered black-skinned like their environment.” Al Jahiz of Iraq 9th century.
“The Arabs used to take pride in their brown and black complexion (al-sumra wa al-sawād) and they had a distaste for a white and fair complexion (al-ḥumra wa al-shaqra), and they used to say that such was the complexion of the non-Arabs.” Ibn Abi al-Hadid 13th c. citing the 9th century Al-Mubarrad in Sharh nahj al-balaghah, V:56.
Bedouin from the Ammarin clan of the Banu Attiyeh, a large clan originally from Jordan, northwest Saudi Arabia and southern Palestine |
Most accounts
through the 15th century in fact continued to denote “the Arabs” as a
people possessing the complexion of Nubians and other sub-Saharan Africans.
Contrary to popular conceptions in our day the bedouin Arabians were well known
for their dark color to the point where some people even assume, wrongly, that the name came from “ereb” or eh-reb meaning dusk or evening in
Hebrew. The words Arabs used for themselves were in actuality the same terms
used to describe the Ethiopians, Abysssinians
and Sudanic peoples in general. These included bedouin terms for very
dark skin such as adam (connoting
some dark like soil), akhdar or khudar (from a word meaning green iron), abyad
(literally white and connoting shining like coals or unblemished), aswad (from sawad connoting black soil),
sumr or samar and asmar (something just short of black). Today these words
can mean different things in different countries of the Middle
East or Arab-speaking world, but the way those same terms are used
by Arab bedouin are not always identical to them.
Wesley Muhammad cited the specialists in Arab bedouin dialects: “In Negev Arabic, Borg informs us, there are three near-synonyms for the black
category: azraq (blue), asmar, and aswad. He affirms: ‘In [Negev Arabic] … as
in other Arabic vernaculars, asmar is the usual designation for dark skin short
of (true) black’” (Muhammad 2012, p. 13; Hare and Kressel, 2009, p. 98).
The term ahmar
or ‘red’ was reserved for people with ruddy skin the color of the Rum (or Byzantines
who were often described as blonds), Slavs, Turks, Syrians, and the Persians or
other Central Asians. It is often mistakenly believed that the term abyad or its variants was used for
people now commonly called “white” in the West, but in reality “white” or abyad
in the Arabic color paradigm was and is commonly
used for people of black color who had shining or bright clear complexions.
Arabian
poets, for example, used the term “abyad” for people with skin shining like
coal. An ancient Arab poem describes the “sons of Abyssinia”
as having both “white faces” and “black faces” with hair of long peppers
(Nicolle and McBride, 1991, p. 11). The term “white” in the original Arab context expressed luminosity or
brightness of tone, and later frequently a shade of blackness described as “black
buckwheat.”
Thus did Ibn Mandour
write -
“The Arabs don’t say a man is white [or:
“white man,” rajul abyad∙] due to a white complexion. Rather, whiteness
[al-abyad] with them means an external appearance that is free from blemish;
when they mean a white complexion they say ‘red’ (ahmar)… And the Arabs
attribute white skin to the slaves.” ( p. 22)
The original or indigenous darker-skinned Shammar from Arabia whom the man above represents, originated with the Tayyi Arabs of Yemen |
Apparently Al –Zabidi (XI:73) who wrote a dictionary of classical Arabic in the 18th century said similarly, “Arabs don’t say a man is abyad due to white skin. Rather, abyad with them is an appearance free from blemish. When them mean white skin they say ahmar” (Muhammad, 2012, p. 8). And even, today in certain Arab-speaking societies, when “referring to skin, an Arabic speaker may use [abyad] (“white”) as a euphemism for [aswad] (“black”)” (Allam, J., 2000, p. 78). Another recent scholar has said, “the word meaning white can be used to describe the color of coal…” (Abdel-Malek, 2000, p. 302)
The Syrian historians whose lingua franca was
Arabic were frank in their descriptions of Arabian people that had settled their
country. Syrian-born al-Dhahabi of the 14th century traveling
through the Hijaz or western Arabia area extending south of Jordan to the Yemen
observed that a fair skin was “very rare” to see in land of Hijaz (where were
Mecca, Medina and Jizan) and stated that persons possessing such a complexion
were assumed to be descendants of slaves i.e. Syrians, Persians, Turks and Rum
(Byzantines). He and Jahiz of the 9th century implied the phrase
then in use “as fair-skinned as a slave” was due to this political situation. Most
slaves of the Arabs in this time had come from the peoples they had settled
amongst, including in Syria,
Central Asia and Byzantium,
especially if they were of Christian origin.
As mentioned previously earlier documents
name these tribal confederations dwelling in goat skins Kedar or Qidar and
later as Nabataeans. In Arab genealogy in fact “Nabit” is said to be the son of Qaydar (Kedar) or sometimes the same as Qaydar, and both of these names
came to connote blackness. The 11th century Syrian Akbar as- Zaman
plainly states “Among the children of Canaan
are the Nabit, Nabit signifies black…”
Medieval Islamic writings of the Abbasid period like those an the 9th c. Persian al-Khwarazimi also speak of “the black Nabatis” (The Life of Imam 'Ali bin Musa al-Rida, by Baqir Sharif al-Qarashi, translated by Jasim al-Rasheed).
Huweit'at or Huwaytat are bedouin stretching between the Tihama, Jordan and Sinai still claiming descent from the ancient Nabataeans. |
The Chinese and Central Asian observers more than a few times make mention of the very black and near black coloring of Arabia’s
peoples as late as the 15th century. An account of Ma Huang and
admiral under Emperor Zheng He described the people of the 300 mile area of the
northern Hijaz stretching between Mecca
(Mochie) stretching past Jedda to Jizan.
It reads, “The people of this
country are stalwart and fine looking, and their limbs and faces are of a very dark purple color” (Mancall, 2006,
pp.126 -127; Waley-Cohen, 2000, p. 48; Mills, 1970, pp. 173-174).
Today, however, much of the population of this region
and in fact of much of Arabia are the product of many diverse populations of
people who originated outside of the peninsula who settled the peninsula during
various invasions since that period. Since the time of al-Dhahabi, Ibn Khaldun and
the 15th century Chinese explorers of the Arabian and African coasts, many mercenary populations have settled in the Hijaz, beginning with the
Mameluk Turks of the 15th and 16th centuries. In addition
bedouin from Syria who were
more biologically Syrian than Arabian in origin have also moved into northern
and central territories of the Arabian peninsula
since the 16th century.
By the 19th century the
peninsula had been completely modified. But
most colonialists appear to have been aware that the original indigenes of the Arabian peninsula or least
modified of the Arabians were in fact close to Africans in appearance. An 1844 a gazeteer mentions that the
inhabitants “of Mecca,
with the exception of a few Hedjaz Bedouin, are foreigners, either foreigners
or the offspring of foreigners…” The
famous town of Jedda or Djidda too had come to be occupied by the peoples “of
almost every Muslim nation” from Afghanistan
and Kurdistan to Persia and Africa (M’Culloch & Haskel, 1844, p. 332).
Sir Richard Burton wrote of the Hamidah a
large clan of the Banu Salim from the Harb tribe of Hijaz (still claiming
descent from Qahtan). He spoke of them as
“small chocolate colored beings, stunted and thin… mops of bushy hair” and
remarked that were a “great Hejazi tribe that has kept its blood pure for the
last 13 centuries” (Burton, R., 1879, p. 173)
Back in the 19th century Charles Doughty in his Travels in Arabia also wrote about the black and shining skins of the tribe of Hatheil or Hudhayl bin Mudrika he met in the Tihama not far from Mecca. Hudhail is closely related the Kinanah and Quraysh tribes. (Doughty, 2011, p. 535) Among them are the clan of Lahiyan or " LIHYAN, an Arab tribe, a branch of the Hudhail" (Houtsma, 1993, p. 26)
The modern Banu Lahiyan (or Lihyan) belong to the Hudhail or Hatheyl. Doughty also wrote of them, "a nomad family met us of (Hatheyl or Qoraysh). They were slight bodies and blackish; a kind of tropical Arabs..." (p. 528). The indigenous Jewish populous of the Hijaz were little different. An Italian traveller from Bologna circa 1500, wrote the following of the Kahanim descendants of Khaibar.
It is said the the small dark-skinned "dwarf" David ha Ruebeni (conveniently called "swarthy" in modern descriptions) who became a sensation in Europe came from Khaibar. He was in fact according to the Jewish commentarist or Talmudist born 1526 Gedaliah Ben Yohanan ibn Yahya ben Joseph in "a man of dark complexion, like a Negro, and of low stature" who claimed to come from the king of the tribe of Reuben) Shalshelet Ha Kabbalah, Jerusalem, 1962 p. 112. (The tribe of Rubanniyyah/Reuben was evidently the name of a clan of the Soleim Arabs).
Thus urban towns of such regions of the Hijaz and Nejd are not populated by the same groups as when Dhahabi and Ma Huang wrote. In some parts of the Yemen or south this change had started occurring even earlier. During the early Islamic era and long before the explorations of Dhahabi and Ma Huang, Persians and other Ebna or non-Arabs had taken over such early Sabaean urban centers of the Yemen such as Sana’a quite literally expelling and infuriating once purely Arab tribes such as Banu Hamdan (mentioned as a clan of the Sabaeans in early inscriptions). It is possibly for this reason the leader of a large tribe of Maddhij to which Hamdan belonged is said to have said that a fair-skinned Arab is “unthinkable” and “inconceivable”. It was the beginning of a kind of Arab or black nationalism that intensified during the Abbasid period in which certain tribal leaders named themselves al-Aswad meaning “the black”.
Back in the 19th century Charles Doughty in his Travels in Arabia also wrote about the black and shining skins of the tribe of Hatheil or Hudhayl bin Mudrika he met in the Tihama not far from Mecca. Hudhail is closely related the Kinanah and Quraysh tribes. (Doughty, 2011, p. 535) Among them are the clan of Lahiyan or " LIHYAN, an Arab tribe, a branch of the Hudhail" (Houtsma, 1993, p. 26)
Ancient statue of the Lihyanites found at Dedan in Arabia. "The Lihyanites were driven out by the Nabateans whose capital Petra (in today’s Jordan) is one of the wonders of the world." |
“At the end of eight days we found a mountain [Khaibar] which
appeared to be ten or twelve
miles in circumference, in which mountain there dwell
four or five thousand Jews, who go
naked or six
spans, and have a feminine voice, and ARE MORE BLACK THAN ANY OTHER
COLOUR. They live entirely upon the flesh of sheep,
and eat nothing else. They are
circumcised
and confess that they are Jews; and if they can get a Moor into
their hands, they skin him alive.”
pp. 14-15 (1997) The Itinerary of Ludovico
di Varthema of Bologna
from 1502 to 1508 translated
from the
original Italian by John Winter Jones.
It is said the the small dark-skinned "dwarf" David ha Ruebeni (conveniently called "swarthy" in modern descriptions) who became a sensation in Europe came from Khaibar. He was in fact according to the Jewish commentarist or Talmudist born 1526 Gedaliah Ben Yohanan ibn Yahya ben Joseph in "a man of dark complexion, like a Negro, and of low stature" who claimed to come from the king of the tribe of Reuben) Shalshelet Ha Kabbalah, Jerusalem, 1962 p. 112. (The tribe of Rubanniyyah/Reuben was evidently the name of a clan of the Soleim Arabs).
Thus urban towns of such regions of the Hijaz and Nejd are not populated by the same groups as when Dhahabi and Ma Huang wrote. In some parts of the Yemen or south this change had started occurring even earlier. During the early Islamic era and long before the explorations of Dhahabi and Ma Huang, Persians and other Ebna or non-Arabs had taken over such early Sabaean urban centers of the Yemen such as Sana’a quite literally expelling and infuriating once purely Arab tribes such as Banu Hamdan (mentioned as a clan of the Sabaeans in early inscriptions). It is possibly for this reason the leader of a large tribe of Maddhij to which Hamdan belonged is said to have said that a fair-skinned Arab is “unthinkable” and “inconceivable”. It was the beginning of a kind of Arab or black nationalism that intensified during the Abbasid period in which certain tribal leaders named themselves al-Aswad meaning “the black”.
Children of Banu Maddhij |
During the Abbasid period many non-Arab
groups began to take over the Islamic world north and eastwards of Arabia. The Abbasid Caliphate and culture quickly became
more Central Asian than Arab. Their leaders unquestionably came to possess a
sense of cultural superiority and pride over the Arabs and their feelings about
them are articulated in a retort by Abbasid al Tha’alibi to the Hashemite Arabs
in which they are insulted and advised to go back from where they came from or
in their words “retreat to the Hijaz” and “resume eating lizards” (Mackey,
1996, p. 59).
It was in this
early period Jahiz along with al –Mubarrad wrote that the Arabs “take
pride in their brown and black complexion (al-sumra wa al-sawād) and they had a
distaste for a white and fair complexion”.
It was also in this
period that a revolt took place by these same Arabs in southern Iraq, although
it has long inaccurately referred to as the Zanj revolt (Talhami, 1977).
M.A.
Shaban, specialist in Abbasid history, had this to say,
“All the talk about slaves
rising against the wretched conditions of work in the salt marshes of Basra is a figment of the
imagination and has no support in the sources. On the contrary, some of the
people who were working in the salt marshes were among the first to fight
against the revolt. Of course there were a few runaway slaves who joined the
rebels, but this still does not make it a slave revolt. The vast majority of
the rebels were Arabs of the Persian Gulf
supported by free East Africans who had made their homes in the region" (Shaban, 1976, p. 101).
The whole idea of Central East African “Zanj”
slaves revolting against slave masters thus appears to be another Western colonialist
projection. Not only were their mainly
free men involved, but they were mostly Arabians rather than enslaved Africans.
A poet named Ibn el
Rumi (d. 896) was part Iranian and part Byzantine, yet, an advocate of the
Arabs who were at the time being ill–treated and mocked for their blackness,
among other things. He came to their
defense with a letter to the Abbasids:
You insulted (the family
of the Prophet) because of their blackness (bi-l-sawad), while there are still
deep black, pure-blooded Arabs. However, you are white – the Romans
(Byzantines) have embellished your faces with their color. The color of the
family of Hashim was not a bodily defect (aha).[From poem of Abu al-Hasan
Ali b. al-Abbas b. Jurayj (Ibn al-Rumi) (d. 896), apud Abu al-Faraj al-Isbahani,
Maqatil al-tãalibiyyin, 759] (Williams, 2009, p. 32).
In
the south Central Asian or Scythic merchants from peoples such as the Seres had
also been settled on the coasts of southern Arabia
and probably the Horn of Africa since Parthian times. But the settlement of
groups of the Azd who had moved east into Oman from the Asir region in the far
southwest coincided with increasing numbers of Iranic peoples in Oman who had
originated near the southern part of the Caspian Sea and Anatolia. The Iranian
Buyyids who had originated near the southern part of the Caspian Sea and
Anatolia had taken over places like Oman in the 10th and 11th
centuries. Seljuk Turks also controlled the area between the 11th
and 12th centuries. And the Ayubbids also of Turkish ethnicity had
ruled the Yemen in the 12th
and 13th century and other Turkish and Slavic populations of the Ottomans
again conquered towns in the Yemen
including Sana’a during the 16th century.
Al-Jahiz,
a 9th century Iraqi had his own ideas on why there was a difference between the
peoples of Arabia and those to the North and
East. He wrote “all the peoples settled in the Harra besides the Banu Sulaim
are black like the tribe of the Banu Sulaym who live in the lava lands of north
Arabia and are rendered black-skinned like their environment” (Swain, Boyce-Stones, p. 255) Jahiz continued stating that though they took
their wives from the Byzantines but through the generations their original
color usually was seen again in their children, “’no sooner have they
reproduced for three generations that the lava lands have turned them all into
the color of the Banu Sulaym’” (Fakhr Sudan 219).
From Jahiz in fact we learn that in many
places these Arabs had settled by his time in Central Asia
and other places, they had come to look much like the native people. He notes
that the people of Central Asia could not be
distinguished from the people with fair “red” skins and chestnut moustaches. This
was certainly the case in parts of Syria,
Spain and Central
Asia and mainly due to the Arabs taking many non-Arab concubines
(wives). A large portion of the Middle East in
fact was simply converted in speech to Arabic, just as previously they had been
converted to Aramaic another language apparently of Arabian (Nabataean) origin.
Jahiz though wrongly attributes these differences in appearance to the
environment rather than the fact that the children of the new Arab settlers had
descended from non-Arab women of each region.
Again, today
much of the population of Arabia is the
product of many diverse groups of people who were originally from outside of
the peninsula who settled the peninsula during various invasions. Their
descendants consider themselves Arabs as do other people of regions mixed with
the early Arab conquerors. But
colonialists appear to have been aware that the indigenous or least modified
Arabians were in fact close to Africans in appearance.
To the south of Hijaz was the Yemen of the Himyarites
whose descendants according to colonialists had traditions of an African
origin. Bertram
Thomas on the modern remnants of the ancient Qahtan tribes: “…these tribes – with the exception of the Harasis – have a tradition of African origin, the
order of their local antiquity being Shahara, Bautahara, Mahra, Qara.” (Found in
The South Eastern Borderlands of Rub-al Khali, Bertram Thomas vol. 73 No. 3 March 1929.)
The 19th century Orientalist John
Baldwin recognized the dark-skinned Yemenites as the original inhabitants of Arabia. He penned the following:
“To the Cushite race belongs the oldest and purest Arabian blood, and
also that great and very ancient civilization whose ruins abound in almost
every district of the country. ..The south Arabs represent a residue of hamitic populations which at one time occupied the whole
of Arabia” (Baldwin, 1874, p. 74).
A Baron von Maltzan
wrote of the peoples of the Yemen
on , “The inhabitants of this part of Arabia
nearly all belong to the race of Himyar. Their complexion is almost as black as
the Abyssinians, their bodies are very finely formed slender, with slender yet
strong limbs, their faces are semitic… ” see (Von Maltzan, p. 121)
The Yafa'a originally a clan of the Rahawiyyin tribe are said to descend "the people of Qahtan" through his sons Himyar and Kahlan in the genealogies. |
An American encyclopedia
says similarly of the peoples further west of Himyaritic speech in Hadramaut
and Oman
known as the Mahra: “The Himyarites are
mentioned in classical literature under the name of Homerites. They traced
their origin to Himyar, grandson of Saba and
descendant of Joktan or Kahtan, one of the mythical ancestors of the
Arabs. According to their traditions,
they became the dominant race in Yemen about 3,000 years before the
time of Mohammed… Direct descendants of the Himyarites are the tribes of
Mahrah. They are black in color, medium
in stature, Semitic in countenance…” (from the 1873, The American Cyclopaedia;
A popular dictionary of general knowledge, Volume 8, p. 734)
Man of the Mahra |
Mahra man. The Mahra tribe of Oman and Hadramaut are thought to descend from the Sabean tribe called "Rhammanitae" (Ra'amah) and still speak the Himyarite-related dialects. |
Others familiar with the appearance of the modern Arabian populations speculated that some of the
inhabitants were also ancestral to certain peoples of southern India as well. In 1948 an officer writing for
a publication entitled - Handbook of the Territories which form the Theatre of Operations
of the Iraq Petroleum Company Limited and its Associated Companies wrote the following, “In Arabia the first inhabitants were probably a dark-skinned, shortish population intermediate, between the
African Hamites and the Dravidians of India and forming a single African Asiatic belt with these. "
Finally Henry Field
offered his assessment “Although the Arab
of today is sharply differentiated from the Negro of Africa, yet there must
have been a time when both were represented by a single ancestral stock; in no
other way can the prevalence of certain Negroid features be accounted for in
the natives of Arabia.”
Men from the mountains of Dhofar of Oman belong mainly to the Qara or Kara folk who claim descent from the ancient Kinda |
Archeology and Forensics of Arabia: Unearthing Black Arabia
Bolstering
these suppositions was and is the forensic evidence of physical anthropologists
and archeologists who had found that most of the ancient humans remains were
not much different then those across the sea in Africa.
Thus G. Elliot-Smith wrote, “There is a
considerable mass of evidence to show that there was a very close resemblance
between the proto-Egyptians and the Arabs before either became intermingled
with Armenoid racial elements” ( Elliot Smith 2007, p. 54).
According to leading archeologists of the last century several of the major lithic industries and
rock art also showed clear resemblances to some of the East African, proto-Egyptian and Saharan materials. The elongated slender people wearing ostrich feathers represented in the art of the deserts such as the Rub-al Khali during the period now called the Late Arabian Pastoral (LAP) period appeared to represent populations bearing physical and cultural similarities to modern Cushitic or Nilo-Saharan speakers. Emmanuel Anati called them “oval-headed Negroids” and noted they seem to be practicing mock ritual battle similar to modern African Nilotes (such as Maasai Samburu). This style of art which appears frequently in the central deserts such as the Rub- al-Khali is now dated to the 3rd to 1st millennium B.C. (Peregrine, p. 257; Wilkinson, 2003, p. 153) and can clearly have been made by the ancestors of the early Islamic people of the era many of whose representatives still tall and black and traded ostrich feathers as late as the last century. This desert region was traditionally said to have been the home of the Amalekites and Adites people who came to be the earliest rulers of the Sabeans and Himyarites.
Another ancient pre-Christian and pre-Islamic ruler of ancient Yemen |
The realistic-dynamic
style of rock art in Central Arabia and the Yemen was once thought to have shared a
connection to those representations in early Gerzean art of the eastern deserts
of Sudan and pre-dynastic Egyptian Nile Valley, and dates mainly to the 3rd
and 2nd millenniums B.C. covering the Bronze Age (though it may have
antecedents as far back as 7000B.C. (Peregrine, p. 257; Wilkinson, p. 178). This type of artistic style receives its name
because of the highly realistic portrayal of animals and people, among other
things.
The culture
found in the western part of the southwestern portion of the Arabian
peninsula and Yemenite region with clearly African antecedents has
been discovered in the is called the Afro-Tihama, Sabir and Afro Arabian tradition. The Sabir Culture named for a major site of Subr “is rooted in a Bronze
Age tradition that continues well into later periods. Manifesting itself in
monumental mudbrick architecture, developed centralized political structures,
and sophisticated irrigation schemes…” (Vogt and Gorsdorf, 2001, p. 1360).
It shares a pottery culture, lithics (stone
industries), megalithic and other cultural traits that link it to early Nubia and dates
back at least to the early 3rd millennium B.C. The builders of this culture were ancestors of the people whom
still speak the dialects related to ancient Sabaean and Himyaritic
linguistic groups.
"In terms of absolute
chronology Sabir culture phase 1 covers the time-span almost from the middle of
the 3rd millennium to the 14th /13th cent. BC
… Phase 2 dates from the 14th /13th century BC to the 9th/th
century BC, but may have extended within the same cultural tradition until the
6th century BC” (Vogt and Buffa, 2005, p. 438). According to Vogt and Buffa, the second phase
of this culture possessed artifacts of small sculptured human and animal
figurines displaying affinities to much earlier Nubian C-group productions (p.
440)
Young bedouin of the Bait Aly tribe of Hadramaut. They still build tombs called Rekem or Rukam tombs which are not dissimilar to those of ancient Nubia, the Horn and found throughout the Sahara. |
The culture called Sabir found in Tihama and other parts of the Yemen and Saudi Arabia shows strong links to the pre-Axumite culture of Abyssinia, Eritrea and Sudan. Its origin is linked to the 3rd millenium megalithic culture of the region. These sites in both Arabia and Africa have been described as belonging to a singular cultural tradition by archaeologist R. Fattovich who stated the following: "the lithic tools from the Saudi Tihama sites are comparable to those of the Gash group in Kassala. Representative sites of the coastal complex have been reported at Sihi in the southern Tihama plain, Adulis, near the Gulf of Zula, in Eritrea; Wadi Urq near Hodeidah in the Yemeni Tihama plain; Sabir (Subr) near Aden. These sites share enough ceramic features to be regarded as regional variants of one cultural tradition (Fattovich, 1997, p. 278).
As well Bronze Age sites in Arabia such as the megalithic
site of Midamman in Yemen
which span the late third to early first millenium B.C. appear to “have parallels not only in the
Sabir culture but also with material on the African side (Petraglia, 2009, p.
264).
According to Petraglia, “Sites from Sihi to Subr along the west and
southern coasts of Arabia … exhibit pottery
that is seen to have parallels with older C-group and Kerma cultures of the
Middle Nile (Phillips, 1998, Kitchen, 2006).” (Boivin, Blench and Fuller, 2010)
Peoples of the northern and southern Tihama plain part of ancient Arabian land of Kush still make huts similar to the other peoples of East Africa |
A large part of this region south of Mecca in Arabia was in ancient times considered the land
of Cush or Kush.
According to Retso “at least the southern Tihama (from Mecca southwards) was
called Kus (Ibn Mugawir)” (Retso, 2003, p. 231, fn. 52). A 19th century Encylopaedia Britannica reads: "In the 5th century the Himyarites, in
the south of Arabia, were
styled by Syrian writers Cushaeans and Ethiopians.” Kush was was undoubtedly the name of a region comprising
both sides of the Eritrean
Sea. Modern scholars are
coming to acknowledge again that much of the time when the Hebrew Bible speaks
of Kush or Kushites it is in fact directly referencing Arabian peoples.
Baldwin,
J. D. (1829) Pre-historic nations or
inquiries Concerning: Some of the Great peoples and Civilizations of Antiquity.
Harpers
Bili, U. (2008) Some aspects of Islam in Africa.
Ithaca Press.
Boivin, N.,
Blench, R., and Fuller, D. (2010). Archaeological, linguistic and historical
sources on ancient seafaring: A multidisciplinary approach to the study of
early maritime contact and exchange in the Arabian
peninsula. The Evolution of
Human Populations in Arabia.
Borg, Alexander. (2009). "Linguistic and Ethnic Observations on tHe Color Categories of the Negev Bedouin. In A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel (Eds.) The Desert Experience in Israel: Communities, Arts, Education, in the Negev. University Press of America.
Borg, Alexander. (2009). "Linguistic and Ethnic Observations on tHe Color Categories of the Negev Bedouin. In A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel (Eds.) The Desert Experience in Israel: Communities, Arts, Education, in the Negev. University Press of America.
Burton, R. (1879). Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to el Medina and Mecca 3rd
edition William Mullen and Son.
Doughty, C. (2011). Travels in Arabia Deserta. Volume II.
Doughty, C. (2011). Travels in Arabia Deserta. Volume II.
Elliot-Smith, G. (2007) The ancient
Egyptians and the origins of civilization, (first published 1923).
Fattovich, R. (1997). The
contacts between southern Arabia and the Horn of Africa in late prehistoric and
early historical times: a view from Africa. Profumi
D'Arabia: Atti Del Convegno. di Bretschneider.
Field, H. (1939). Anthropology,
Memoirs Arabs of Central Iraq; Their History, Ethnology and Physical
Characters, Anthropology Memoirs, Field Museum
Press Volume 4.
Goldenberg, D.
(2005). The Curse of Ham. Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
Borg, Alexander. (2009). "Linguistic and Ethnic Observations on tHe Color Categories of the Negev Bedouin. In ((Eds.) A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel The Desert Experience in Israel: Communities, Arts, Education, in the Negev. In A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel University Press of America.
Houtsma, T. (1993). E.J. Brills' First Encyclopaedia of Islam, Volume 5.
Borg, Alexander. (2009). "Linguistic and Ethnic Observations on tHe Color Categories of the Negev Bedouin. In ((Eds.) A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel The Desert Experience in Israel: Communities, Arts, Education, in the Negev. In A. Paul Hare, and Gideon M. Kressel University Press of America.
Houtsma, T. (1993). E.J. Brills' First Encyclopaedia of Islam, Volume 5.
Le Gassick, T . (2000). The Life of the Prophet Muhammad: English translation of Ibn Kathir's Al Sira al Nabwiyya.Ibn Kathir.
Mancall, P. C. (2006 ). Travel Narratives from the Age of Discovery: An Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Mancall, P. C. (2006 ). Travel Narratives from the Age of Discovery: An Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Muhammad,
W. (2012). Abyad and
the Black Arabs: Some Clarifications
Nicolle, D. and
McBride, A. (1991). Romes enemies 5: The
desert frontier. Oxford
and NewYork: Osprey Publishing.
Peregrine, P. N. and Ember, M. (2001). Encyclopedia of Prehistory: South and
Southwest Asi, Volume 8.
Petraglia, M. D. (2009). The Evolution of Human Populations in Arabia:
Paleoenvironmental Prehistory.
Retso, J. (2003). The Arabs in Antiquity. Their History from the Assyrians to the Ummayyads. Routledge.
Retso, J. (2003). The Arabs in Antiquity. Their History from the Assyrians to the Ummayyads. Routledge.
Rosenthal, F. (1958) Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah, New York:
Pantheon Books.
Shaban, M.A. (1976). Islamic
history: A new interpretation. 750-1055. Vol. 2. Cambridge University
Press.
Swain, S. and
Boyce-Stones, G.R. Seeing
the Face Seeing the Soul: Polemons’ Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to
Midieval Islam. Oxford
Talhami, G. (1977). The Zanj Rebellion Reconsidered,
The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 10:3 pp. 443-461 http://www.jstor.org/pss/216737
Vogt, B. and Gorsdorf, J. (2001). Excavations
at Ma’layba and Sabir, Republic
of Yemen: Radiocarbon
datings in the period 1900 to 800 cal bc. International Radiocarbon Conference No17, Jerusalem, Israel
(18/06/2000), 43 (3).
Vogt, B. and Buffa, V.(2005) Cultural interactions with the Horn of Africa – a view from early Arabia. Afrikas Horn: Akten Der Ersten Internationalen Littmann-Konferenz 2, Meroitica
Von Maltzan, H. (1871).
“Geography of Southern Arabia” in Proceedings
of the Royal Geographical Society of London, Vol. 16, No. 2 , pp. 115-123.
Waley-Cohen, J. (2000). The Sextants of Beijing. Global Currents in Chinese History. W. W. Norton and Company.
Waley-Cohen, J. (2000). The Sextants of Beijing. Global Currents in Chinese History. W. W. Norton and Company.
Wilkinson, T.
(2003). Archaelogical landscapes of the Near East. University
of Arizona Press.
Williams, W.
(2009). “Anyone who says the Prophet is black shall be killed”: The
De-Arabization of Islam and the Transfiguration of Muhammad in Islamic
Tradition. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved from http://drwesleywilliams.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Muhammad_Article.34892420.pdf
(Please feel free to make copies in case anything disappears. There are many people that publish, or copy and paste the information from this blog onto other sites. However, as a person with multicultural interests and background, I would appreciate if the above text is not copied and pasted without quotes under pseudonyms, or anonymously, to other web-sites in combination with trading curses or using abusive words with other individuals, or else, verbally insulting, denigrating, or attempting to dehumanize various ethnic groups, i.e., "white people", Europeans, "Arabs", " Jews", "Turks", Israelis, etc. Please do not modify or add to text directly copied or taken from this site. Thanks in advance for your consideration. : )
8 comments:
As-salaamu-alaikum, keep up the the fight, akhi. Indeed this is the truth. You may also be intouch with them but I can share others who are fighting for the truth as well. Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, THE LOST BOOKS OF AFRICA: We Charge Genocide; Tariq Berry, THE UNKNOWN ARAB. He also has a website and blog; SAVE THE TRUE ARABS. Dr. Wesley Muhammad, AFRARABIA. and please check out my book, Halim Mustafa al-Kanemi; THE DEVELOPMENT OF AL-ISLAM IN THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY and blog, mustafaalkanemi.wordpress.com
Thank you for your visit to my blog.
So now that I've learned that the original Hebrews and Israelites were Black, that the original Arabians were Black, that the Sumerians were Black, that Greece was Black, and that Northern Europe and China/East Asia also were, it's a fair question where exactly so called "White" people came from, and when they emerged? Thank you.
Mr. Xianshan - I am curious to learn where you learned that all of these populations were black. I don't remember talking about Northern Europe and East Asia in this blogspot. From what I understand, however, physical anthropology has shown that almost all of these places you mentioned had significant populations of dark-skinned or "black" or tropically-adapted people long before the coming of "whites", or those that can be called the direct ancestors of modern Europeans (or their kinsmen in northern Asia.)
Thus, according to some East Asian researchers, for example, people of "white" or modern Eurasian affiliation actually became numerous in Mesopotamia only in the Parthian i.e. Scythian dominated period of Iran/Persia. - See Naomichi OGIHARA et al. Geometric morphometric study of temporal variations in human crania excavated from the Himrin Basin and neighboring areas, northern Iraq
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE Vol. 117(1), 9–17, 2009
Ogihara in the article above writes about Iran, "... this study suggests that the Himrin population was relatively dolichocranic and generally unaltered until the Parthian period as in southern Mesopotamia (Keith, 1927; Ehrich, 1939; Swindler, 1956), but sometime in or after the Parthian period a more brachycranic population came into this northern Mesopotamian area and craniofacial characteristics within the inhabitants in this area probably became more diverse, as preliminarily suggested by Ishida and Wada (1981) and Wada (1986). It has been suggested based on archeological data that the population of Mesopotamia began to be influenced by Persians after the Achaemenean domination, and more foreigners were settled and mixed with the native population in the Parthian period (Roux, 1992). The present results do not contradict this view. Furthermore, this study depicts the DOLICHOCEPHALIC population as having a lower orbit and broader (lower) nose, and VICE VERSA in the brachycranic population."
The implications of his statements are astonishing given that Sumerian civilization ended long before teh parthian period began in Iran. Yet his conclusions are actually in accord with the statements of early specialists like Sayce and Arthur Keith that found early populations to be "Negroid". It also explains early assertions by specialists like Ephraim Speiser that the bulk of the sculptured figurines seemed to represent a different "racial type" than represented in the remains. Speiser stated that "... there is a MARKED DISCREPANCY between the evidence of the cemetaries uncovered in Sumer and the appearance of the historic Sumerians depicted on the monuments. For it has been REPEATEDLY OBSERVED that the monumental representations of the Sumerians point for the most part to pronounced roundheads.” Ephraim Speiser, Oriental and Biblical Studies collected writings of E.A. Speiser 1967.p. 217) As is well known the Uruk and early Ur remains are predominantly "brown race" Mediterranean or "Eurafrican" an early euphemism for the name for the predominant or African inhabitants of Nubia, Abyssinia, Arabia, the Levant and Europe.
Unfortunately Eurocentrist pseudoscientists, like Waddell and Carleton Coon came to apply the term "Eurafrican" and "Aryan" to these indubitably black types whose remains were in fact similar to the Natufians, Mushabians, Nubians and other African-originated peoples. Coon tried to confuse them with modern Europeans, who in fact are neither regionally broadnosed, nor dolichocephalic or long and narrow-headedas were the majority of the earliest neolithic peoples.)
You are certainly correct that it is a fair question to ask where and when the ancestors of modern Europeans emerged. But, early on certain physical anthropologists assumed most Cro-Magnons and the earliest Europeans were white and as a result anthropologists have not sought out the true origins of the ancestors of modern Europeans. Instead they have tried to make the east African AfroAsiatic-speakers into some ancestral white man that had turned black only after settling in Africa, among supposed pre-Adamites, i.e. the Negro.
There was also the impress early polygenetic theory which sought to show that each continent was associated with or had evolved different branches and even species of humanity represented by different colors, for example red, yellow, black, white and brown races. This is also partly how the fallacious theory of a brown "Mediterranean" and/ or "hamitic Caucasoid" race was developed.
On the other hand it should be said that what physical anthropologists have confirmed since the beginning of the study of human remains in Europe is that people of modern European type though in existence during the neolithic were in actuality a very small or insignificant proportion of the populations of Asia and Europe up until and even after the neolithic period. Recent studies have shown that the ancestors of white "Europeans" and their kinsmen in the Mediterranean, and northwestern Asia are closely related and evolved from people who were closely represented in the mesolithic period in a few sites in Germany. In other words modern Europeans and Eurasiatics show a clear and close relationship with each other and evolved from peoples whose remains were discovered in mesolithic Germany. These mesolithic peoples were already distinct from or distinguishable in many traits craniofacial and osteological from the majority of early paleolithic Cro-Magnons - the latter showing a closer connection to later black or tropically-adapted Asians, Africans and Mediterraneans that were the original purveyors or carriers of neolithic and early bronze age civilization to Europe and northwestern Asia (as were also found in Anatolia and Mongolia and Anshan China).
In other words it is believed that the majority of early Cro-Magnons were in fact not the primary ancestors of modern Europeans. The former is in fact a generic name for upper palaeolithic men in Europe and they were in fact originally in the main tropically adapted populations probably very dark in color. What studies on human remains have shown is that during the neolithic, peoples with affinity to inhabitants of a few sites in mesolithic Germany began to move into areas occupied by the neolithic peoples in Europe and Asia. We find for example European people with palaeolithic culture still present on Crete at a time when people of tropical or African origin had already settled with a developed neolithic lifestyle in the Levant, southern Europe and southern Asia. These dolichocephalic or long-headed tropically-adapted people with neolithic culture and associated veneration of the mother Goddess appeared as far east as the Zagros, and India. European types (always marked by a mesocranic and brachocephalic skull formation) appeared in the Levant in the neolithic, but were not as numerous as the mainly African originated Natufians and Mushabians which they also came to mix with in the Ghassulian culture and other places. By the Copper Age descendants of the black or original neolithic peoples had extended into Turkestan and Turkmenistan (as at Anau), as well as India (which already had black populations) and by the early Bronze Age they were found in eastern Asia. However, Brace as others before him had found that some of the peoples of Natufian and robust African-affiliated crania were found at sites like Tepe Hissar in Iran, and Mongolia by the late Bronze era.
It should be understood that these blacks or tropically adapted neolithic had little to nothing to do with the so-called negrito Andaman Islanders and Austric speaking brachycranic populations of places like Papua, southern China and Indo China, the Philipines, but more likely had something to do with groups like the blacks or some of the so-called robust "Melanesian" and "gracile "hamitic" types that appear in Mongol, Indonesian and early Chinese Bronze Age cultural sites.
As far as Greece or Sumeria being black of course that depends on what period you are talking about. It is evident that Neolithic and early Bronze Age Greece like the rest of the ancient Aegean, Mediterranean, Anatolia and Mesopotamia was predominantly African and then Afrosemitic until a period later than most European scholars were willing to admit.
There are of course many books that show sculptured figurines of people of seeming Eurasian ancestry that appeared in certain sites in Mesopotamia. The question however is now what period do such artifacts belong to, as the physical anthropological evidence shows that the region was dominated by the same black or African-Arabian affiliated population that occupied Ethiopia, ancient Egypt, Nubia, southern Sahara and Iran in the Sumerian period. Did the Japanese archaeologists misread the chronology of the Mesopotamian layers. Is the Western chronology of the Mesopotamia and Sumero-Akkadian civilization even correct. These are some of the questions that need to be addressed in order to assess why certain scientific facts coming out are not in alignment with what European scholars have been publically proposing and in fact promoting for so many years in textbooks.
But one thing is for certain, until European researchers stop seeking to make all early civilized blacks into dark or burnt skinned whites we can look forward to another few decades before your question can be resolved.
As for the origins of "white" people, the findings of remains in Mesolithic Germany suggest that one of the early humanoid populations of Europe of northern Asia must have mutated and mixed with the Neanderthals or perhaps with groups with Neanderthal genes at some point prior to the Mesolithic. The people closest related to the early Mesolithic whites according to the studies by Brace et al appear to be the Basques who some claim evolved from admixture with or absorption of Neanderthal man in early Western Europe.
Some researchers have suggested that skin or complexion of Europeans emerged as recently as 6000 years ago, however I think this is unlikely as there is rock art evidence (unless that has been faked) in ancient Neolithic Anatolia showing long-haired and white or very fair-skinned European types present already, quite distinct in appearance from the blacks also represented there. Skeletons of the blacks which is the neolithic gracile so called Mediterranean race found there are as usual quite different or distinct from that of the modern Eurasians in the region.
je suis sans parole.vraiments les noirs doivent revedinqueur notre vittorie vole par les autres pour nous faire passer par des Moins que rien s.
Post a Comment